Last Click Attribution: the right model for your business?

Reading time16 min.
Content

Introduction

In digital marketing, attributing a conversion to a specific channel is essential for evaluating campaign performance. Although it was long the dominant model, Last Click attribution is still in use despite the evolution of buying journeys. But is it still relevant today? What are its biases? And most importantly, what alternatives exist?

What Is Last Click Attribution?

Last Click attribution is a model that credits the last interaction before a conversion. For example, if a user clicks on a Facebook ad, then does a Google search before making a purchase, Google Ads will receive 100% of the credit for the conversion.

Last Click attribution gained prominence in the 2000s with the rise of online advertising platforms, particularly Google Ads. Its main advantage is its simplicity—it’s easy to implement and understand. It relies on the idea that the last interaction before the conversion is the one that triggered the final action (purchase, install, sign-up, etc.).

It is particularly used:

  • By default, on many analytics tools (Google Analytics, Meta Ads, TikTok Ads, etc.)
  • In e-commerce or direct performance contexts, where data volume is high and conversions are quick
  • When journey data is incomplete: in the absence of a robust multi-touch solution, Last Click serves as a “default” model

However, this widespread use is based less on analytical relevance than on ease of implementation and technical compatibility with standard tools. Today, more and more marketers are questioning this model in light of fragmented customer journeys.

Advantages of Last Click Attribution

  • Easy to Implement: Last Click is the simplest model to set up in an analytics tool or ad platform. It doesn’t require complex data processing or algorithmic modeling: only one touchpoint is considered, which simplifies analysis.
  • Clarity in Performance Analysis: By giving 100% of the credit to a single source, the model avoids complex attribution splits across channels. This provides results that are easy to interpret and use, even for non-experts.
  • Alignment with Default Platform Models: Many platforms (Google Ads, Meta, TikTok…) use a Last Click or derivative model by default. Working with this model ensures direct consistency with native tracking tools, without extra adjustments.
  • Relevant for Short Conversion Cycles: When the decision-making cycle is very short (e.g., impulse purchase, mobile app download, post-click immediate conversion), the last touchpoint is often the one that truly influenced the conversion.
  • Useful in Retargeting: Last Click can be useful for assessing the effectiveness of remarketing or retargeting campaigns, where the goal is to finalize an already-initiated action. In such cases, the last touchpoint often is decisive.
  • Works in Limited Data Environments: When it’s not possible to track all touchpoints (e.g., no cross-device tracking, lack of first-party data), Last Click remains a “fallback” model that still allows for conversion attribution.

What Are the Challenges of Last Click Attribution?

Last Click attribution presents several key limitations, especially in environments where purchase journeys are multi-touch, cross-device, and influenced by many touchpoints.

Users interact with a brand through a multitude of channels: social media, email, search engines, influencers, display ads, CTV… They also switch devices (mobile, desktop, tablet). In this context, Last Click only credits a single touchpoint—the final one—and ignores everything that came before.

Consequences:

  • Upper-funnel or engagement channels (e.g., TikTok, YouTube, Meta) may be undervalued or completely ignored
  • Budget allocation strategies may overly favor bottom-funnel channels like retargeting or branded search

The Last Click model creates the illusion that only the last channel “converts,” leading to major biases in analysis.

Real-world example:
A user discovers an app via a TikTok ad, clicks on an email link later, then does a Google search to download the app. Google Ads receives all the credit—even though it merely captured an already warm intent.

Problems:

  • KPIs are inflated for some channels and underestimated for others
  • Performance looks good on paper but doesn’t reflect true campaign effectiveness
  • Reporting becomes misleading: just because a channel closes the sale doesn’t mean it generated it

The conversion funnel includes several stages: Awareness → Consideration → Conversion → Retention.
Last Click attribution disregards this logic. It removes the temporal and progressive nature of engagement.

Implications:

  • Upper funnel importance is neglected, despite its critical role in filling the conversion pipeline
  • Campaigns are optimized for short-term wins rather than long-term growth
  • Strategic imbalance occurs: campaigns perceived as less profitable (but essential for awareness or consideration) are stopped, harming the overall acquisition strategy

What Are the Alternatives to Last Click Attribution?

The multi-touch model distributes conversion value across several touchpoints (first touch, intermediate interactions, last touch, etc.).


It offers a more complete view of the journey and enables more balanced budget decisions.
Example: A U-shaped model gives more weight to the first and last touchpoints, while others use linear distribution.

These models use only one touchpoint, but not necessarily the last.

  • First Click: credits the very first interaction (useful for identifying acquisition sources)
  • Linear Attribution: spreads value evenly, but remains simple

While imperfect, these alternatives may better serve certain goals (brand awareness, upper funnel, etc.)

Attribution Last Click vs First Click

  • Last Click focuses on the last channel touched before a conversion (purchase, sign-up, install…). It’s often used to assess bottom-funnel campaign effectiveness, targeting already-engaged users.
  • First Click highlights the initial channel that triggered the user journey. It’s better suited for evaluating the impact of awareness or acquisition campaigns.

Summary:

Last click attribution vs first click attribution
  • Last Click: if your goal is closing or immediate profitability, and your decision cycle is short
  • First Click: if you want to analyze top-of-funnel channels or drive awareness-based strategy

Remember:
Last click attribution vs multi-touch vs first click

What About SKAN & View-Through Attribution?

  • SKAdNetwork (SKAN) is Apple’s attribution framework post-ATT. It follows a Last Touch logic, but with privacy constraints (delay, anonymity, etc.).
  • View-Through Attribution (VTA) credits a conversion to an ad impression, even without a click. It’s useful for awareness or branding campaigns but requires strict conditions (attribution windows, frequency, etc.).

These approaches add complexity to attribution and further reveal the limits of Last Click in a post-IDFA world.

Key Concepts to Understand

  • Attribution Window: the timeframe during which a conversion can be credited to a channel
  • Touchpoint: any interaction between the brand and the user
  • Cross-Device: ability to track user journeys across devices
  • Incrementality: measures the true impact of a channel (vs. conversions that would have happened anyway)
addict mobile retargeting visuels addict bureau equipe 2 03

Do not hesitate to contact with our teams

Addict can support you to improve your performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Last Click is simple but reductive
  • It ignores earlier interactions that are often critical
  • It’s poorly suited to cross-device or multi-channel journeys
  • Models like multi-touch or view-through provide more granular insight
  • Choose the right model based on your marketing goals and data maturity

Conclusion

Last Click attribution has long been dominant due to its simplicity. But in today’s complex, multi-touch, multi-channel environment, relying on it alone leads to flawed strategic decisions. To truly optimize campaigns and allocate budgets effectively, it’s essential to explore alternative models—ones that are more nuanced and better reflect the reality of customer journeys.

Our offices

addict mobile acquisition mobile nos bureaux paris fotolia 81153288 1 of7e11zthko8kvdd92eni0sat0sbjobvy2hku8787s 01

Paris / FRANCE

17 Rue du Sergent Bauchat
75012 Paris
France
acquisition mobile addict mobile nos bureaux madrid fotolia 146093924 of7e7i5ydni28k04lcri3w75j6zzcwxl5zmidkmziw 02

Madrid / SPAIN

Calle Juan Ignacio Luca de Tena 1,
Planta 3
28027 Madrid
España
acquisition mobile addict mobile nos bureaux adobestock 244098175 04

New York / USA

10 East 40TH St.,
Suite 3310 New York
NY 10016
USA